The average person does not even question the allegory of the Israel bondage in so-called Egypt. Even though at this supposed time in history the place that the bible authors call Egypt didn't get the name Egypt until well after these events supposedly happened. (Basically the so-called Egyptians NEVER called or referred to them selves and the land as Egypt)
More like "KMT" or "Ta Mari".
As far as physical evidence, there is none. I say this from PRIMARY RESEARCH meaning that i have been the KMT personally, i have seen and read the "MTU NTR" mistakenly called hieroglyphs.
The truth of the matter is that it was the "HYSKOS" where the ones that actually came to KMT. They temporarily gained power and were eventually driven out and they settled in the area known as Palestine today.
You can research King NARMER palette, this records the history of this event.
Just one more thing,
The so-called Egyptians never had slaves or advocated slavery. They were too highly evolved beings to even consider this corrupt concept.
Slavery didn't come in until the successive invasions of the foreigners began, and the invaders gained power.
Pyramids were not created by slave labor, that was only in the movies.
Even modern men cannot figure how it was done
Also Egyptians,they never mined for gold, as supreme alchemist they created gold. just a note
not a drop! its quit funny that, as negus amlak stated, there is evidence that the hebrew/hyksos DID enslave egyptians!!!! also, contrary to belief, no slaves built pyramids, kmt stone masons(architects) sacrificed periods of their lives willingly to build them!
I&I must humbly disagree with the idea that the Isrealites were not enslaved. I&I do not have any "documentation", but I&I family thru I&I father has had traditions stemming from the exodus, and are told stories passed down from generations, lest this be forgotten. I&I know for I&I self that this in fact did happen, but that the story itself had been twisted in order to fit the idea of the U-rope-ian masses, IE: Egyptians enslaved the Isrealites in order to build the pyramids. As it has been stated before, the Egyptians were highly educated at that time, and could have found a more then sensible way to complete their works instead of enslaving a people. Even in the stories we were told as youths, almost excludes any actual "Egyptian" evidence, just that fact that they were held captive...
decipher the hieroglyphs on these pictures, you will find that some of them have nothing to do with the hebrew, also, others will further show that the hyksos were oppressors in khemt and not enslaved at all! bless!!! brother Ashra Kwesi has covered this topic extensively, do a you tube search and he has hours of documentation, with the translations of the text done right in khemet with out here-say. The allegorical tales of the exodus are still inspiring but can not be seen as historical.... more love!
Greetings Family
Yes true, I know Ashra Kwesi's documentaries and he has proven that there is no documentation of slavery taking place nor is there a documentation that proves that Moses was ever in Egypt. Apparently Moses was royal in Egypt, so therefore there should be a sign of him being there. So it brought me to a realisation that he never existed.
Would (racist) rednecks make any form of tribute or acknowledgement to MLK JR, Malcolm X or HIM? Just completely disregard their existence... At a time where white people had the power, and still do, to alter ourstory, they can perceive what they want, how they want. Even though we know better, but it doesn't change the reality of oppressors having the power to stomp out who they deem fit.
Give thanks for collective insight.............I have also read that Kushite Egypt (Kemet) under the joint rule of pharoahs Shabako and Shebitku confronted the Assyrian army (under Sennacherib) when they invaded Pheonicia, Philistia and Judah and actually stopped the Assyrians from conquering Jerusalem in 701 BC. This of course is not described in the bible however the "Egyptians" were referred to as the "angel of the Lord" who came and slew the Assyrians. The book is called The Rescue of Jerusalem. I would highly recommend
Is it possible that the relationship between Israelites and "Egyptians" varied depending on which Pharoah was ruling? The book above explains that at one point the Israelites and Nubians had an alliance.
Though the Israelite might have been enslaved, the bones that are found at the cemetry of the people who were "enslaved" had operations on them. For instance there was a skull with signs of medical operation and even other bones, to show that this people were well taken care of. The arguement is, if they were slaves why did they receive such hospitality.