In the name of the Mother, the Daughter and the Holy Spiritess

[Baby Tafari]

Blessings Family

I ave sometimes ovaheard some (especially wombmen) being all annoyed wid the Hola Trinity concept as “the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit”.

Male names for Jah such as the Father anologies, tend to stress the similarities between Jah and human beings, whiles amidst these similarities, there are significant dissimilarities between Jah and humans –for example in the realm of gender.

The Father anologies, together with the maleness of Christ has sometimes been used as the theological foundation for the belief that only the male human may adequately image God, and it has also been used as a bad excuse to place up the maleness of humanity as normative. This whiles the maleness of Christ is a contingent aspect of His identity (yea coz I an I all kno Christ neva made any big deal outta bein male, rather the opposit, chillin wid anyone seing everybodys worth!). Christ’s maleness is no essential aspect of His identity and cannot be allowed to be a basis of the domination of females by males, any more than the person of Christ legitimates dominans of gentiles by Jews, or plumbers by carpenters!!!

So dont get mad gyaals, it all comes down to the nature of Sin.

According to the same male oriented christian tradition some of the most common notions of sin is pride, ambition and excessive self-asteem. Yes, and these sins are in fact fundamentally male in orientation and does not correspond to the experience of women. Women tend to experience sin in lack of pride, lack of ambition and lack of self-asteem!!!

So go figure. Know Jah and know thyself, dats all, and the rest will just fall into place.

Blessings

/Teee

[Hailemah Amhara Solomon,TimelessI]

Greetings SIs good to see the I back . Bless de I and Imily as always.
InI have a relevant reasoning on this post but will post tomorrow.
Bless Haile...
Sis Hailemah

[Ras Dasein]

Simply and beautifully put. Full I-greement.

dasein
x

[Sis Kaya IsesaJah]

Blessed Sistren, give THANKS for the REASONmant and the fact that the I is finally forwarding here again...SOOOO THANKFULL FOR THE I!!!!!!!!!

With regard to this reasoning and as an addition to this Reasoning:

I would like to say that in addition to it not mattering that Jah 'person' is referred to maleness, and that it really don't matter (as the I used a great I-sample of plumber versus carpenter), but also the fact that Man cannot assume domination over females becuz Jah never teach that as truth-but not only is that wrong, but ALSO on the converse, if any of InI male or female think we are akin OR equal to God, (I see nuff ones stating 'we are gods, goddesses') we are thinking wrong, and even within scrip, we are interpreting His word wrong. Perhaps we think we are gods of THIS world, and unfortunately the gods of this world, include satan, who i-tinually instigates the perversion of Jah real INTERPRETATION AND HIS LAW,...so while man cannot attribute his likeness to Jah in terms of flesh (the HE part), and use that to OVER LORD the female part, WE as His I-ration, cannot use the fact that we are, InI Human beings are equal to one another-we cannot use this as being 'equal' to the Father, we can NEVER can be equal to God and so therefore, man=wombman but not = to the I-rator, even though we are equal to One Another...LOL, I hope I made sense I Sis...just something that I alway see, some ones saying man over woman and then some ones say we are not only equal to one another, but we are equal to Jah, and mi know seh that is wrong.
So glad Sis to sight the I forward!!! Nuff Nuff Love!!

[CynthiJAH]

....no words needed here,blessed love